A Response to John Frame’s “Two Models of Divine Transcendence”
Dr. Brian Huffling Dr. Brian Huffling’s research interests include: Philosophy of Religion, Philosophical Theology, Philosophical Hermeneutics, and general issues in Apologetics and Biblical studies. See his personal blog here. Twitter Wordpress Linkedin John Frame has written a blog article titled “Two Models of Divine Transcendence: Pure Being vs. Divine Lordship.” He states, “In this paper, I will […]
Five Things You Can Do to Correct Error and Reverse Heresy in the Church
Recently I was asked to read a startling study. It surveyed American evangelical Christians (age 18-34). These are not your unsaved neighbors and co-works. They are the people that sit next to you and me, in the pew every . . . well, probably, hopefully, most Sundays. In short, the troubling study showed error and […]
Is Apologetics A Discipline? A Conversation with Robert Bowman
A few months ago I wrote a post titled “Why Christian Apologetics Is Not A Discipline.” Dr. Robert Bowman has graciously responded with a blog post titled “Is Apologetics a Discipline?” I appreciate Bowman’s article as it highlights the importance and nature of apologetics. I have been a fan of his for well over decade since I read his and […]
An Open House to Cherish the Past, Honor the Present, and Build for the Future
In case you missed it, here is a quick breakdown of what happened at Southern Evangelical Seminary’s (SES) August 4th Open House. In the heart of South Charlotte, NC, in the Ballantyne neighborhood, perspective students gathered to have a luncheon with faculty and friends of SES. Alumni, including a pastor, a former U.S. Army Ranger […]
Apologetics: Loving people enough to answer their honest questions.
As we celebrate the birth of our Savior Jesus Christ this Christmas season, we must always understand that the incarnation of our Savior, “the Word made flesh” (Jn. 1:14) cannot be viewed in isolation and in a vacuum. The miracle of the birth of our Savior to the virgin Mary must always be understood as […]
KEN HAM PROVES OUR POINT BY MISSING IT AGAIN
[et_pb_section bb_built=”1″][et_pb_row][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text _builder_version=”3.0.67″ background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” border_style=”solid”] We would like to make a few clarifying points regarding Ken Ham’s most recent comments regarding Southern Evangelical Seminary (SES) and his dialogue with Dr. Richard Howe at this past October’s SES National Conference on Christian Apologetics. First, we appreciate Mr. Ham calling our attention to the title wording of […]